Eagle News Blog

TREASONOUS (NY) TIMES

"An exhaustive list of instances when the New York Times has endangered national security over the past half century would take many more pages, but the point has been made. Enough is enough. The Times’ blatant subversion of the United States under the guise of a twisted interpretation of the Constitutional right to free speech needs to end. The Constitutional guarantee to freedom of speech depends first and foremost on the existence of the United States, and that existence is now being jeopardized by an Orwellian rag run by morally warped propagandists who think betraying their country is a badge of honor and who will stoop to any depth of deceit in order to sidestep whatever laws or constitutional processes stand in the way of their unelected agenda. Our Constitution makes room for three branches of government. It delegates no authority whatsoever to a fourth estate, much less a fifth column. It’s time for our elected officials and the American people to tell the Times that time is up."

The rest is here

RELIGIOUS LEFT = ANTI-AMERICANISM?

Dennis Prager points out in an L.A. Times Commentary that

"As far as the news media are concerned, there is no religious left, only the religious right and "mainstream" denominations — and, of course, the religious right is regularly described as bigoted, narrow-minded and intolerant, not to mention a threat to the separation of church and state.

"Yet, within Christianity and Judaism, the left is very much alive, and in Judaism it is dominant. This leftism was made apparent last month in Houston at the biennial convention of the Union for Reform Judaism, the largest of Judaism's denominations..."

"Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of the Jewish religious left's convention was how clearly it revealed the supremacy of leftist concerns over Jewish ones. History will record that a month after the Islamic Republic of Iran called for the annihilation of the Jewish state, 5,000 Reform Jews passed resolutions calling for District of Columbia voting rights and "workers' rights" but none about a call for what would amount to another Holocaust or about Islamic anti-Semitism generally, the greatest eruption of Jew-hatred since Nazism. History will likewise also note that two years after the United States made war on a bloodthirsty tyrant who paid the families of murderers of Jews $25,000 each, Reform Judaism passed a resolution condemning that war.

Prager states that these actions by the union of Reform Judaism reveals "the supremacy of leftist concerns over Jewish ones"

It also, however, reveals the supremacy of leftist concerns over Christian ones

It also reveals the supremacy of leftist concerns over News Gathering ones!

Leftist news.

Leftist jews.

Leftist christians.

All against america's most fundamental values. All against taking the war on terrorism seriously. All against israel's and america's defense against the jew-hating, christian-hating, America-hating, Western Civilization-hating, freedom-hating movement of global jihad.

It's the leftism. All part of "political correctness," "multiculturalism," "moral equivalency," the "blame-America-first-last-and-always" reflex, and other subdivisions of cultural Marxism's "inside job" of system-wide internal erosion: the undermining of every value and every loyalty and every way of understanding life that makes America free, safe, robust, stable, and respected, at home and abroad.

So what's the "formula" for the left's cultural Marxism?

It infests every area of our life and thought. it subverts decent americans' love and respect for our country, and for our legitimate and necessary national interests.

The formula? Just as with news, Christians, and Jews, cultural Marxism cons Americans into valuing the alleged supremacy of leftist (ultimately anti-American) concerns over all loyal, traditional, mainstream, America-loving ones!

All in the names of the most noble causes, of course. Peace, Justice, the public's right to know, academic freedom, civil rights, resisting oppression, divesting from Israel, helping others less fortunate, etc. etc., ad infinitem.

Underneath all of these, and so many more, it's always the same poisonously nourishing soil. What's that?

It's the leftism.

Shhhhhhh! Don't wake the news!

PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING AT THE U.N.

     We begin with the "Fill-in-the-blanks" test. Today's "test" courtesy of Cox and Forkum, Web cartonists.

Click pic to enlarge

     Don't miss the rest. If you love America, and what America stands for, you must inform yourself on this issue. The news doesn't touch it.

     It turns out, if the UN is united about anything, it's: weakening America's strength, allies, resolve, prosperity, security, and prestige.

     Since much of MSN/DNC's most deeply held leftist "truths" reflect similar sentiments, they have no problem painting the U.N. as a genuine force for peace among peaceful nations.

     Hie thee to Cox and Forkum right away. Just click right here. Read their item!

Go to the links, too, especially Ann Bayefsky's brilliant and dedicated Eye On The U.N. Somebody's gotta watch them. The news certainly doesn't.

ENEMY PRESS

That's the title of this article by David Horowitz

Here's the first paragraph:

"This is a war. You can be unhappy about it and sit it out. That's ok. That's what a democracy is about. You're right to dissent. You can criticize the war and vote for another government that will leave the field of battle. That's ok too. That's also what a democracy about. But while an elected government and the young men and women it sends into battle are engaged with a ruthless enemy in the field, you can't work to cripple their efforts , or do the work of the enemy side and expect the rest of us not to regard you as a saboteur and a Judas and an enemy within."

Here's the last paragraph:

"Thank you George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and the thousands of men and women under arms who have had to fight a war against a ruthless enemy with half the country either on the sidelines or actively stabbing them in the back."

Read it all right here

ARE WE FIGHTING A WAR OR NOT?

   Since we are, the sentiments below, held by many, perhaps even most Americans, should be at least factored into our leftist, know-no-enemy-but-America news. I'm not saying that this perspective should be the only one considered. I am saying that to ignore it, is to ignore what huge numbers of Americans think and feel.

   That's one reason among many that people are increasingly turning away from mainstream news outlets. The News refuses to acknowledge that we were attacked, that we must fight back.

   They focus exclusively on  American negatives such as alleged torture of suspected terrorists. Yet they ignore barbaric acts by those who wish us all dead.

   From an anonymous email:

  "Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not   started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September   11, 2001? Were people from all over the world, mostly Americans, not  brutally murdered that day, in downtown Manhattan, across the Potomac   from our nation's capitol and in a field in Pennsylvania?

   "Did nearly   three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or   crushing death that day, or didn't they?

  "And I'm supposed to care that a copy of the Koran was "desecrated"   when an overworked American soldier kicked it or got it wet?

  "Well, I don't. I don't care at all.

  "I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents  for incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11.

  "I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start  caring about the Holy Bible, the mere possession of which is a crime in  Saudi Arabia.

  "I'll care when Abu Musab al-Zarqawi tells the world he is sorry for   hacking off Nick Berg's head while Berg screamed through his gurgling,  slashed throat.

  "I'll care when the cowardly so-called "insurgents" in Iraq come out   and fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by   hiding in mosques.

  "I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search  of nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their  suicide   bombs.

  "I'll care when the American media stops pretending that their First   Amendment liberties are somehow derived from international law instead   of the United States Constitution's Bill of Rights. A right they have  only because soldiers they despise and whose very lives they undermine  with their one-sided reporting protect it.

  "In the meantime, when I hear a story about a brave Marine roughing up  an Iraqi terrorist to obtain information, know this: I don't care.

  "When I see a fuzzy photo of a pile of naked Iraqi prisoners who have   been humiliated in what amounts to a college hazing incident, rest   assured that I don't care.

  "When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told   not to move because he might be booby-trapped with a bomb, you can take  it to the bank that I don't care.

  "When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat,  and fed 'special' food that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining  that his holy book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe in  your heart of hearts that I don't care.

  "If you agree with this view point, pass this on to all your e-mail   friends. Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this   ridiculous behavior! If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete   button. Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when  more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great  country."

America's News. Citizens of the world --- or just plain treasonous?

BLIND HATRED MAKES FOR DANGEROUS "NEWS"

   "Can it be that many national reporters are so afflicted by Bush hatred that they can’t ...report stories straight? Could be. If we lose in Iraq, it will be the first great victory for global jihad, with tremendous consequences for the U.S. Can the media get over their obsession with Bush and focus on that?"

More here

AMERICA'S MOST TREASONOUS CARTOONIST?

Ted Rall. Every time you think he (or the syndicate and newspapers who pay to publish this toxic glop) couldn't possibly sink any lower...

Click pic to enlarge

More here

PROPAGANDA PATSIES?

   "This is how the communists manipulate our press. That it happens time after time demonstrates the problem we face as a nation as we struggle with a menace, fanatical Islam, more insidious than the international communist movement."

More here

SHHHH! DON'T WAKE THE NEWS!

   Bless Mark Steyn, for he gets it about our fraudulent, anti-American news

   "On Friday, the allegedly explosive "Arab street" finally exploded, in the largest demonstration against al-Qa'eda or its affiliates seen in the Middle East. "Zarqawi," shouted 200,000 Jordanians, "from Amman we say to you, you are a coward!" Also "the enemy of Allah" - which, for a jihadist, isn't what they call on Broadway a money review..."

   "True, he did manage to kill a couple of dozen Muslims. But what's the strategic value of that? Presumably, it's an old-fashioned mob heavy's way of keeping the locals in line. And that worked out well, didn't it? Hundreds of thousands of Zarqawi's fellow Jordanians fill the streets to demand his death.

   "Did they show that on the BBC? Or are demonstrations only news when they're anti-Bush and anti-Blair? And look at it this way: if the "occupation" is so unpopular in Iraq, where are the mass demonstrations against that? I'm not talking 200,000, or even 100 or 50,000. But, if there were just 1,500 folks shouting "Great Satan, go home!" in Baghdad or Mosul, it would be large enough for the media to do that little trick where they film the demo close up so it looks like the place is packed. Yet no such demonstrations take place."

more here

ARABIC DAILY CRITICAL OF ARAB MEDIA

"...We are fed up with media that consistently tell us that all Arab crises are caused by the Jews and Americans."

Funny. That's my complaint about American news and media!

"...about the abuse of Iraqis by Americans ..."